Canon 35/2 with Leica M8

Discussion in 'Leica M Camera Forum' started by raid, Mar 24, 2017.

  1. raid

    raid Leica Place All-Pro

    Apr 12, 2013
    USA
    Raid
    • Like Like x 2
  2. raid

    raid Leica Place All-Pro

    Apr 12, 2013
    USA
    Raid
    M8_CAN_35_2-131-X2.

    M8_CAN_35_2-138-XL.

    M8_CAN_35_2-7-X2.

    M8_CAN_35_2-22-X2.

    M8_CAN_35_2-24-X2.

    M8_CAN_35_2-77-X2.

    M8_CAN_35_2-104-X2.

    M8_CAN_35_2-121-X2.

    M8_CAN_35_2-70-X2.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  3. Brian

    Brian Super Moderator Subscribing Member

    Apr 3, 2013
    This is a sharp lens- far more contrast than the 35/1.8 that it replaced. I picked one up cheap that required haze be cleaned out of the inner elements on each side of the aperture ring, as happens with many of the later Canon RF lenses.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  4. raid

    raid Leica Place All-Pro

    Apr 12, 2013
    USA
    Raid
    I used to use the Canon 35/1.8, but I have not used it in years.
     
  5. M. Valdemar

    M. Valdemar Leica Place Regular

    91
    Aug 5, 2013
    New York City
    Did you know there was a Version One and Version Two of the Canon 35mm F2? The Version Two had slightly different cosmetics and possibly improved coating. They are much rarer than the first version.

    I own and have shot with both versions with the Leica M9. To my eye, the Canons are a little less sharp than the 35mm Leica Summarons and Summicrons of the same era.

    On the other hand, I also have the 35mm Canon f1.5 which is razor sharp to my eye when stopped down beyond f4 or so. Its close rival, the Nikkor 35mm f1.8 in LTM is neck and neck with the Canon 1.5. I prefer the Nikon lens because I'm a lifelong Nikon fan, but both produce excellent results.

    I think most of the 1950's era Canon lens were high quality and you can't go wrong with almost any of them.
     
    Last edited: Jun 24, 2017
    • Agree Agree x 1